Tumbling Atheist

darwinsminion:

robertlovespi:

The “White Women’s Workout.”  Not for the easily-offended.  You’ve been warned!

Love

Black extremist response:

This video is racist! It promotes the stereotype that black men are thugs and dangerous. That black men are purse-snatching fiends hungry for white women!

Feminist extremist response:

This video is sexist! It promotes the idea that women shouldn’t be out alone, can’t fend for themselves, and should be thin!

Normal people response:

That’s funny! -OR- Meh, that’s corny.

My response:

I wonder if his penis is bigger than mine?

goodreasonnews:

karnythia:

So, what was that about Jim Crow attitudes being ancient history? Explain to me how racism is over & black people are their own problem rhetoric exists in the face of stories like this one. Run it down like I’m two.

Ron Paul thinks this is the free market and should be protected.

In all seriousness, if Ron Paul’s approach became the law of the land, the United States would erupt in civil war within a few short decades.

soundlyawake:

“And speaking of slavery, black people in this country would not be Christians if it weren’t for slavery.”

So true! It’s crazy when you think of it like that! I adore this fellow.

FYI: To report someone for hate speech, death threats, etc. send a link to support@tumblr.com with the subject of “Harrassment.”

jadedfucker:

wtfwhiteprivilege:

I’m mad I had to Google that shit to find out how to do it…

Important information. Report hate speech and hate crimes.

What concerns me is who defines “hate speech” and by what parameters is it defined. One of my other tumblr blogs was recently suspended for re-blogging a photo of a man walking with a woman behind him toting a large amount of beer. A caption under the picture read: Wives - because beer is heavy.

Some overly sensitive thought-cop felt that I needed a taste of censorship, reported me, and bam.  Took me a day to figure out why I couldn’t log in, as tumblr didn’t even feel the need to direct me to a page explaining the issue. Instead, I was directed to a page that informed me of…nothing, just a failure to load properly page. After several back-and-forth message between myself and the folks behind the scenes at tumblr, they explained what happened and why.

I understand and appreciate that some people want to be victimized, regardless of the intent of the material at hand, and will always be on the lookout for anything that can possibly be forced into being hate, sexist, racist, oppressive, aggressive, anti-this and anti-that; however, I’ll never respect this absurd need.  Not that they honestly want to experience this victimization, no: they merely want to have the claim. I don’t understand the psychology behind it, nor do I really care. I care that these individuals distract from very real abuse and hate that causes very real suffering in the world for others.

The picture that got my tumblr banned was offensive, yes.  It was also obvious humor, with nothing but humor as its intention. Hurt feelings suck, but they’re certainly no reason to start censoring people.  I’ve had my feelings hurt more times than I could possibly count.  I’m an overly sensitive person myself, but I would never belittle myself or anyone else by expecting some authority to move in and censor those who irritate my sensibilities.

I guess I can only hope that the person responsible for killing my other tumblr has had time to reflect and realize how petty the act of trying to bring about censorship over that particular photograph was.

801reasons:

Mom: And you know he went up there, ‘cause you know they bring you food on real china.”
me: “fdjskgljkgs;l”

801reasons:

Mom: And you know he went up there, ‘cause you know they bring you food on real china.”

me: “fdjskgljkgs;l”

parsingthoughts:

People really love dressing up racism as free speech.

I agree.  Yet, it still begs the question: is speech free if it is to be restricted out of fear of offense?

I like jokes about blondes, christians, atheists, fat people, thin people, men, women, black people, white people, yellow people, dogs, cats, jews, muslims, republicans, democrats…pretty much anything, as long as its funny.

I’m white, yet I’m secure enough and mature enough to be able to deal with, and laugh at, humor making fun of white people.  My wife is black, my two children are mixed. I’m able to laugh at jokes poking fun of black and mixed folks—so is my wife. My wife is handicapped and uses a wheelchair.  She likes jokes regarding disabilities just as much as me (remember Handiman from In Living Color?).

Stereotypes can be useful and humorous—which is exactly why members of stereotyped groups often use those same stereotypes to make people laugh.  If I had a nickle for every time Kat Williams made fun of himself or other black folk for the silly things found within the stereotype of black folk and made me laugh hard, I’d have enough to buy myself a fancy lunch right about now.  Ditto with all the jokes he’s made about white people.

What’s worse, the racist who does nothing more than verbally express his dislike/hatred for other races, or the person who wants to censor unpopular thoughts and ideology for fear of offending the sensitivities of others?

Both are acts of discrimination.  Both can lead to physical violence (and I assure you, anyone who came to me and tried to force me to censor my thoughts and speech, save for times when such censorship is appropriate, like when on nation tv with POTUS, they’d probably be rewarded with some form of violence or an other).

I expect the government to protect my liberty to say things.  Not just anything, but things that are unpopular and offensive.  It isn’t the popular ideas that needs protection.  It’s things like my many articles floating around on the internet criticizing religion, the Bible, Christianity, the historicity of Jesus, the government itself, the President of the US (past and present). 

That same freedom is used…and abused…by just about every advocacy group out there.  Look at the anti-male sexism that is so prominent within online feminist communities, yet these same people who so blindly and eagerly bash and trash men, stereotype and generalize their discrimination of them, are so very, very quick to stand up and and whine and cry about anti-female sexism on the net and media.  They demand to have the right to say what they say, yet condemn others for saying similar things about them.

Similar things occur within every community that I’ve ever dropped into: religious, anti-religious, pro-life/pro-choice, and even (especially) forums discussing race and racial issues. 

I don’t have to like everything that I hear.  I’m all grown up and smart enough to think for myself.  When I hear a black comedian on TV making fun of white people for smelling like wet dogs, it’s no skin off my back.  I’m a big boy.  When I hear a woman on TV making a joke about how men are barely domesticated baboons….hey, it’s usually funny, what the kind of person would I be to expect them to censor themselves because they might hurt my precious little feelings?

Take Rachel Maddow, for example. I thoroughly enjoy her show.  I like it a lot, but she frequently takes unwarranted jabs at men.  It’s usually not so obvious that you notice it right away, but it’s there.  She recently did it very blatantly and without pause in her episode dedicated to schooling one of the Republican presidential candidates on birth control and human reproduction.  I only found it ironic that she dedicates so much of her online time persona complaining about male on female sexism, yet never stops to consider her own female on male sexism.  But, hey, it was funny stuff.  I’m mature enough to understand that.

Now, let me take a quick moment to share a real life experience.  As I said, my wife is black and I am white, so our children are mixed.  A good friend of mine once made the innocent mistake of referring to my youngest son as a “niglet.” Niglet.  Now, I think the term is rather cute and funny.  Whether or not my assessment is correct is purely a matter of personal taste. 

But, it just so happened that this was MY niglet that he was talking about. (See that, what I just did?) Consequently, his harmless word-joke was offensive to me.  I explained this to him.  I said, “say that again and I’ll break your nose.”  Simple as that.  No big deal.  I understood he was just making a joke; I made it clear to him that I didn’t want his joke. He can say it all he likes, I just would like him to respect my children and me by not saying it in our presence.  All was well, we laughed about it, and proceeded to do what we were doing.

Beating a black man to death because he is black is bad.  Dragging a gay man behind a car until he is dead—or just dragging him, period—is bad.  Dragging or killing anyone is bad.  Saying you dislike gay people or black people (or anyone else), while distasteful, primitive, and symptomatic of low intelligence and a small mind, is nothing more than an expression of opinion.

Should the KKK be free to exist as a non-violent group which promulgates the idea of race supremacy, separation, and a disdain for racial interbreeding?

Opinions will vary on that question, but I think it’s an essential YES, and the KKK is surely one of the most prominent symbols of not just racism, but highly organized and financed racism in our country.  Let them say whatever the hell they want.  Those with the ability to think clearly, for themselves, and intelligently will recognize their bunk for what it is. 

Yes, people like dressing racism up as free speech. That practice put Malcom X in a position of power and influence, even though he later changed his position and backed out of the anti-white club.  But, as with the old adage about fitting shoes: if the dress fits, wear it.  In most cases, however distasteful, non-violent expressions of racism are still nothing more than a poorly exercised right to speak freely.